Topic summary
⁠25%2 analyzed articles/videos670 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Reflecting Pool Damage results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 223 hits. Analysis detected 1,306 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,680 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (13,406 of 22,421 topics). This Reflecting Pool Damage is better (less manipulative) than 59.80% of the peer group.
Reflecting Pool Damage
Topic details
Total words: 2,680
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

40% percentile
025507510040.2% percentile
2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.5%4.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 0.2%0.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Special Pleading: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.3%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos