Topic summary
⁠29%1 analyzed article/video672 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Redemption results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Self-Serving Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 181 hits. Analysis detected 1,305 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,688 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (15,618 of 24,545 topics). This Redemption is better (less manipulative) than 63.60% of the peer group.
Redemption
Topic details
Total words: 2,688
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510036.4% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.7%6.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.2%2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Composition/Division: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos