Topic summary
⁠16%1 analyzed article/video1,732 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Real Estate Agents results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Hasty Generalization, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5% saturation with 348 hits. Analysis detected 2,794 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,928 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠12% (20,083 of 22,655 topics). This Real Estate Agents is better (less manipulative) than 88.60% of the peer group.
Real Estate Agents
Topic details
Total words: 6,928
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

11% percentile
025507510011.4% percentile
1.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.0%5.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos