Topic summary
⁠73%1 analyzed article/video490 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Python In House results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Appeal to Emotion, and False Dilemma, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 225 hits. Analysis detected 1,481 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,960 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (6,787 of 24,545 topics). This Python In House is worse (more manipulative) than 72.40% of the peer group.
Python In House
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,960
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

72% percentile
025507510072.4% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.5%11.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.3%8.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 7.0%7.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.5%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Personal Incredulity: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos