Topic summary
⁠48%4 analyzed articles/videos1,844 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Public Health Warnings results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 967 hits. Analysis detected 3,763 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,376 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (15,986 of 24,314 topics). This Public Health Warnings is better (less manipulative) than 65.70% of the peer group.
Public Health Warnings
Topic details
Total words: 7,376
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

34% percentile
025507510034.3% percentile
1.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles7.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.1%6.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 13.1%13.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.2%0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos