Topic summary
⁠91%1 analyzed article/video2,457 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pro Israel Advocacy results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Ad Hominem, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 31.3% saturation with 3,078 hits. Analysis detected 14,256 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,828 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (6,465 of 24,545 topics). This Pro Israel Advocacy is worse (more manipulative) than 73.70% of the peer group.
Pro Israel Advocacy
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 9,828
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

74% percentile
025507510073.7% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 31.3%31.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.1%12.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 8.7%8.7%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 8.4%8.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.4%14.4%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 31.3%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 2.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Straw Man: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 0.9%Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos