Topic summary
⁠49%2 analyzed articles/videos1,678 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Prime Video results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 1,097 hits. Analysis detected 4,162 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,712 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (14,591 of 24,545 topics). This Prime Video is better (less manipulative) than 59.40% of the peer group.
Prime Video
Topic details
Total words: 6,712
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

41% percentile
025507510040.6% percentile
2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 16.3%16.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos