Topic summary
⁠94%1 analyzed article/video478 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Presidential Aspirations results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 17.3% saturation with 331 hits. Analysis detected 2,856 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,912 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠89% (2,837 of 24,545 topics). This Presidential Aspirations is worse (more manipulative) than 88.40% of the peer group.
Presidential Aspirations
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,912
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

88% percentile
025507510088.4% percentile
6.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 17.3%17.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 17.3%17.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 7.6%7.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 8.2%8.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 9.2%9.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.4%6.4%Dunning-Kruger EffectSitewide 0.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 17.3%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 17.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 4.6%In-Group Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.2%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 5.3%Begging the Question: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 1.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.7%Dunning-Kruger Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.4%Circular Reasoning: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos