Topic summary
⁠39%1 analyzed article/video890 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Portland Politics results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Unattributed Quote, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 26.6% saturation with 946 hits. Analysis detected 2,355 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,560 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (10,634 of 23,727 topics). This Portland Politics is worse (more manipulative) than 55.20% of the peer group.
Portland Politics
Topic details
Total words: 3,560
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

55% percentile
025507510055.2% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 26.6%26.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.3%9.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 26.6%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.4%Indoctrination: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.0%Personal Incredulity: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos