Topic summary
⁠35%1 analyzed article/video750 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Response results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Ad Hominem, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 372 hits. Analysis detected 1,471 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,000 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (12,035 of 24,545 topics). This Political Response is worse (more manipulative) than 51.00% of the peer group.
Political Response
Topic details
Total words: 3,000
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

51% percentile
025507510051.0% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 12.4%12.4%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 0.1%0.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.9%2.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 6.8%6.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.4%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.4%Middle Ground: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos