Topic summary
⁠97%4 analyzed articles/videos3,329 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Reform results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 1,778 hits. Analysis detected 16,933 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,140 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (8,117 of 23,795 topics). This Political Reform is worse (more manipulative) than 65.90% of the peer group.
Political Reform
Topic details
Total words: 12,140
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

66% percentile
025507510065.9% percentile
3.2% BS Score4 analyzed articles12.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.4%10.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.4%11.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.8%10.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.7%14.7%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 5.5%5.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 3.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 2.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.7%Horn Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Straw Man: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos