Topic summary
⁠81%3 analyzed articles/videos889 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Organizations results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 24% saturation with 781 hits. Analysis detected 4,715 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,250 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (5,117 of 23,993 topics). This Political Organizations is worse (more manipulative) than 78.70% of the peer group.
Political Organizations
Topic details
Total words: 3,250
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

79% percentile
025507510078.7% percentile
4.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.3%11.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.5%2.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.2%4.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 24.0%24.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.2%3.2%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 16.7%16.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 24.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 3.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.0%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos