Topic summary
⁠81%1 analyzed article/video1,998 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Grudges results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 947 hits. Analysis detected 8,282 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,992 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (11,725 of 23,944 topics). This Political Grudges is worse (more manipulative) than 51.00% of the peer group.
Political Grudges
Topic details
Total words: 7,992
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

51% percentile
025507510051.0% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.6%10.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.8%11.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 8.2%8.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.2%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos