Topic summary
28%2 analyzed articles/videos935 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Engagement results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 310 hits. Analysis detected 2,118 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,117 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 58% (10,443 of 24,413 topics). This Political Engagement is worse (more manipulative) than 57.20% of the peer group.
Political Engagement
Topic details
Total words: 3,117
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

57% percentile
025507510057.2% percentile
2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 8.4%8.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.8%2.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.9%9.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 2.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Composition/Division: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.2%Indoctrination: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos