Topic summary
⁠56%1 analyzed article/video395 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Betting results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Ad Hominem, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.6% saturation with 278 hits. Analysis detected 1,407 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,580 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (5,832 of 22,097 topics). This Political Betting is worse (more manipulative) than 73.60% of the peer group.
Political Betting
Topic details
Total words: 1,580
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

74% percentile
025507510073.6% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 17.6%17.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.7%13.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.8%6.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 7.9%7.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Tu Quoque: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Special Pleading: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.3%Horn Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos