Topic summary
29% 1 analyzed article/video 697 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Player Drafts results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Self-Serving Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 245 hits . Analysis detected 1,189 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,788 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 41% (13,351 of 22,547 topics). This Player Drafts is better (less manipulative) than 59.20% of the peer group. Player Drafts
Topic details
Total words: 2,788
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.8% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 8.8% 8.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.2% Red Herring: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst