Topic summary
⁠70%2 analyzed articles/videos1,118 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pipeline Safety results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 16.7% saturation with 748 hits. Analysis detected 3,306 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,472 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (9,175 of 21,862 topics). This Pipeline Safety is worse (more manipulative) than 58.00% of the peer group.
Pipeline Safety
Topic details
Total words: 4,472
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

58% percentile
025507510058.0% percentile
2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.9%4.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.9%12.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.0%3.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.7%2.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 16.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Straw Man: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos