Topic summary
⁠3%1 analyzed article/video928 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Per Capita Analysis results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 3% saturation with 111 hits. Analysis detected 424 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,712 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (18,117 of 23,992 topics). This Per Capita Analysis is better (less manipulative) than 75.50% of the peer group.
Per Capita Analysis
Topic details
Total words: 3,712
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

25% percentile
025507510024.5% percentile
1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 3.0%3.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 1.9%1.9%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos