Topic summary
⁠77%2 analyzed articles/videos2,142 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pensions results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 1,156 hits. Analysis detected 6,132 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,200 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (11,115 of 24,576 topics). This Pensions is worse (more manipulative) than 54.80% of the peer group.
Pensions
Topic details
Total words: 7,200
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

55% percentile
025507510054.8% percentile
2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.4%6.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 16.1%16.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.3%5.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.2%10.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos