Topic summary
62% 1 analyzed article/video 1,321 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Patient Neglect results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Confirmation Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 752 hits . Analysis detected 3,737 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,284 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 51% (10,919 of 22,261 topics). This Patient Neglect is worse (more manipulative) than 51.00% of the peer group. Patient Neglect
Topic details
Total words: 5,284
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.0% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 14.2% 14.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 11.2% 11.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Burden of Proof: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.4% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst