Topic summary
⁠64%1 analyzed article/video911 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Park Renovations results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 18.7% saturation with 681 hits. Analysis detected 2,964 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,644 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (6,670 of 22,262 topics). This Park Renovations is worse (more manipulative) than 70.00% of the peer group.
Park Renovations
Topic details
Total words: 3,644
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

70% percentile
025507510070.0% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 18.7%18.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.0%13.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.4%3.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.8%2.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 6.3%6.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Topic 18.7%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.3%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.3%Middle Ground: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos