Topic summary
⁠57%2 analyzed articles/videos1,472 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Parenting Advice results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Negativity Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 6.6% saturation with 390 hits. Analysis detected 4,449 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,888 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (13,486 of 24,545 topics). This Parenting Advice is better (less manipulative) than 54.90% of the peer group.
Parenting Advice
Topic details
Total words: 5,888
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

45% percentile
025507510045.1% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.2%5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 5.8%5.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos