Topic summary
73% 79 analyzed articles/videos 37,594 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nyc Crime results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Halo Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 19,892 hits . Analysis detected 121,883 faulty-reasoning hits from 160,829 analyzed words across 79 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 16% (19,811 of 23,403 topics). This Nyc Crime is better (less manipulative) than 84.70% of the peer group. Nyc Crime
Topic details
Total words: 160,829
Article count: 79
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.3% percentile 1.4% BS Score79 analyzed articles160.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.8% 8.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.4% 12.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst