Topic summary
⁠95%3 analyzed articles/videos1,512 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nursing results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Slippery Slope, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 531 hits. Analysis detected 5,691 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,371 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (9,281 of 24,545 topics). This Nursing is worse (more manipulative) than 62.20% of the peer group.
Nursing
Topic details
Total words: 5,371
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

62% percentile
025507510062.2% percentile
2.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.9%9.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.7%7.7%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 9.1%9.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.6%0.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 1.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.1%Red Herring: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.7%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos