Topic summary
⁠64%5 analyzed articles/videos2,162 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nuclear Policy results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Optimism Bias, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 1,236 hits. Analysis detected 9,309 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,380 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (14,511 of 23,715 topics). This Nuclear Policy is better (less manipulative) than 61.20% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

39% percentile
025507510038.8% percentile
2.0% BS Score5 analyzed articles12.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.0%10.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.6%3.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos