Topic summary
54% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,793 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Networking results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Optimism Bias , and Halo Effect , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 975 hits . Analysis detected 5,966 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,308 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 48% (11,680 of 22,425 topics). This Networking is better (less manipulative) than 52.10% of the peer group. Networking
Topic details
Total words: 8,308
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
48% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.9% percentile 2.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles8.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 11.7% 11.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 8.5% 8.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 15.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst