Topic summary
⁠23%1 analyzed article/video992 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nanny Cam results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 486 hits. Analysis detected 2,770 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,968 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (10,443 of 23,716 topics). This Nanny Cam is worse (more manipulative) than 56.00% of the peer group.
Nanny Cam
Topic details
Total words: 3,968
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

56% percentile
025507510056.0% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 12.3%12.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.1%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.4%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Special Pleading: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos