Topic summary
⁠46%2 analyzed articles/videos1,387 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mummies results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Hasty Generalization, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 475 hits. Analysis detected 4,251 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,548 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (13,527 of 22,929 topics). This Mummies is better (less manipulative) than 59.00% of the peer group.
Mummies
Topic details
Total words: 5,548
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

41% percentile
025507510041.0% percentile
2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.8%4.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.3%7.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 8.4%8.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.3%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos