Topic summary
82% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,565 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mudslides results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.1% saturation with 1,336 hits . Analysis detected 3,844 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,323 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 62% (9,471 of 24,545 topics). This Mudslides is worse (more manipulative) than 61.40% of the peer group. Mudslides
Topic details
Total words: 6,323
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.4% percentile 2.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.4% 8.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 21.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.2% Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst