Topic summary
⁠48%2 analyzed articles/videos1,266 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mlb Trades results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 439 hits. Analysis detected 1,921 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,212 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (14,452 of 22,721 topics). This Mlb Trades is better (less manipulative) than 63.60% of the peer group.
Mlb Trades
Topic details
Total words: 4,212
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510036.4% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.5%4.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.4%10.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.4%4.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Straw Man: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.9%Indoctrination: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos