Topic summary
⁠25%1 analyzed article/video363 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mikie Sherrill results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Negativity Bias, and Ad Hominem, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 158 hits. Analysis detected 688 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,452 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (11,458 of 23,519 topics). This Mikie Sherrill is worse (more manipulative) than 51.30% of the peer group.
Mikie Sherrill
Topic details
Total words: 1,452
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

51% percentile
025507510051.3% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.5%4.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.2%2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.9%10.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.3%2.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Special Pleading: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos