Topic summary
⁠60%2 analyzed articles/videos1,825 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Migrant Children results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 1,147 hits. Analysis detected 4,999 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,300 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (14,035 of 24,426 topics). This Migrant Children is better (less manipulative) than 57.50% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

43% percentile
025507510042.5% percentile
2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.3%9.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.0%6.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.2%0.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.2%1.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos