Topic summary
⁠23%1 analyzed article/video587 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michigan Gas Prices results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 167 hits. Analysis detected 813 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,348 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (16,534 of 24,572 topics). This Michigan Gas Prices is better (less manipulative) than 67.30% of the peer group.
Michigan Gas Prices
Topic details
Total words: 2,348
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

33% percentile
025507510032.7% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 7.1%7.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.9%1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 0.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos