Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Mental Health Defense results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Straw Man, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 327 hits. Analysis detected 920 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,995 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 23,584 topics). This Mental Health Defense is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Mental Health Defense
Topic details
Total words: 1,995
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.5%5.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 2.5%2.5%Middle GroundSitewide 0.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 5.5%5.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 1.9%1.9%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 3.0%3.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 3.7%Straw Man: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Middle Ground: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Special Pleading: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos