Topic summary
⁠85%2 analyzed articles/videos925 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Medical Neglect results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 17.3% saturation with 826 hits. Analysis detected 4,024 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,782 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (8,476 of 24,545 topics). This Medical Neglect is worse (more manipulative) than 65.50% of the peer group.
Medical Neglect

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

66% percentile
025507510065.5% percentile
3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.5%10.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.4%1.4%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 5.7%5.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 17.3%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 2.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos