Topic summary
⁠77%2 analyzed articles/videos416 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Medical Innovation results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 26.8% saturation with 446 hits. Analysis detected 2,012 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,664 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of ⁠84% (4,008 of 24,545 topics). This Medical Innovation is worse (more manipulative) than 83.70% of the peer group.
Medical Innovation
Topic details
Total words: 1,664
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

84% percentile
025507510083.7% percentile
5.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 26.8%26.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.3%13.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 10.3%10.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 6.0%6.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 26.8%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.7%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Bandwagon: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos