Topic summary
⁠12%3 analyzed articles/videos1,988 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Medical Case Study results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Negativity Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 463 hits. Analysis detected 2,549 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,952 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠9% (22,334 of 24,545 topics). This Medical Case Study is better (less manipulative) than 91.00% of the peer group.
Medical Case Study
Topic details
Total words: 7,952
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

9% percentile
02550751009.0% percentile
1.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Red Herring: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos