Topic summary
⁠76%4 analyzed articles/videos3,089 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mayoral Elections results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 2,387 hits. Analysis detected 20,669 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,184 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (15,275 of 22,909 topics). This Mayoral Elections is better (less manipulative) than 66.70% of the peer group.
Mayoral Elections

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

33% percentile
025507510033.3% percentile
1.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles23.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.1%8.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.3%10.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.2%10.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.0%0.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 2.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos