Topic summary
⁠61%2 analyzed articles/videos928 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Law Enforcement Actions results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 477 hits. Analysis detected 3,208 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,712 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (9,864 of 23,603 topics). This Law Enforcement Actions is worse (more manipulative) than 58.20% of the peer group.
Law Enforcement Actions
Topic details
Total words: 3,712
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

58% percentile
025507510058.2% percentile
2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.8%12.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 4.5%4.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Red Herring: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos