Topic summary
⁠41%1 analyzed article/video1,061 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Las Vegas Tourism results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Anecdotal, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 410 hits. Analysis detected 2,481 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,244 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (14,094 of 22,406 topics). This Las Vegas Tourism is better (less manipulative) than 62.90% of the peer group.
Las Vegas Tourism
Topic details
Total words: 4,244
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

37% percentile
025507510037.1% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.7%9.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.4%5.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.7%2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.3%False Dilemma: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos