Topic summary
⁠19%1 analyzed article/video810 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kit Carson Park Redevelopment results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 244 hits. Analysis detected 1,122 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,240 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (18,222 of 24,545 topics). This Kit Carson Park Redevelopment is better (less manipulative) than 74.20% of the peer group.
Kit Carson Park Redevelopment
Topic details
Total words: 3,240
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

26% percentile
025507510025.8% percentile
1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.3%6.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos