Topic summary
88% 6 analyzed articles/videos 2,892 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ken Paxton results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 1,571 hits . Analysis detected 13,352 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,568 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 49% (12,610 of 24,545 topics). This Ken Paxton is better (less manipulative) than 51.40% of the peer group. Ken Paxton
Topic details
Total words: 11,568
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 48.6% percentile 2.4% BS Score6 analyzed articles11.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 13.6% 13.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.8% 7.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 12.3% 12.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 13.2% 13.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 2.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst