Topic summary
79% 8 analyzed articles/videos 6,954 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kansas City Royals results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 2,099 hits . Analysis detected 16,539 faulty-reasoning hits from 24,540 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 21% (18,932 of 23,893 topics). This Kansas City Royals is better (less manipulative) than 79.20% of the peer group. Kansas City Royals
Topic details
Total words: 24,540
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.8% percentile 1.5% BS Score7 analyzed articles24.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.2% 7.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst