Topic summary
10% 5 analyzed articles/videos 3,377 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Juvenile Crime results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Confirmation Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.9% saturation with 667 hits . Analysis detected 4,290 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,508 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 4% (22,193 of 22,944 topics). This Juvenile Crime is better (less manipulative) than 96.70% of the peer group. Juvenile Crime
Topic details
Total words: 13,508
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.3% percentile 1.0% BS Score5 analyzed articles13.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.1% Begging the Question: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst