Topic summary
⁠50%1 analyzed article/video1,297 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Islamist Extremism results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 618 hits. Analysis detected 3,046 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,188 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (12,065 of 24,545 topics). This Islamist Extremism is worse (more manipulative) than 50.80% of the peer group.
Islamist Extremism
Topic details
Total words: 5,188
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

51% percentile
025507510050.8% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.9%11.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.2%8.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.9%0.9%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 5.4%5.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Horn Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.0%Tu Quoque: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos