Topic summary
98% 5 analyzed articles/videos 2,291 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iran-Us War results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Self-Serving Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 1,552 hits . Analysis detected 12,290 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,200 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 64% (8,974 of 24,545 topics). This Iran-Us War is worse (more manipulative) than 63.40% of the peer group. Iran-Us War
Topic details
Total words: 10,200
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.4% percentile 3.0% BS Score5 analyzed articles10.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 14.4% 14.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 8.7% 8.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 10.1% 10.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst