Topic summary
⁠61%3 analyzed articles/videos2,515 analyzed words
BS Summary: These International Politics results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 2,607 hits. Analysis detected 9,925 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,843 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠19% (19,614 of 24,031 topics). This International Politics is better (less manipulative) than 81.60% of the peer group.
International Politics

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

18% percentile
025507510018.4% percentile
1.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles19.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.8%8.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.1%13.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos