Topic summary
⁠24%1 analyzed article/video1,661 analyzed words
BS Summary: These International Hacking Groups results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Availability Heuristic, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 6.6% saturation with 440 hits. Analysis detected 1,876 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,644 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of ⁠4% (21,658 of 22,410 topics). This International Hacking Groups is better (less manipulative) than 96.60% of the peer group.
International Hacking Groups
Topic details
Total words: 6,644
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

3% percentile
02550751003.4% percentile
1.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.5%4.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.6%6.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos