Topic summary
⁠53%1 analyzed article/video1,037 analyzed words
BS Summary: These International Cybercrime results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 562 hits. Analysis detected 2,553 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,148 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (10,008 of 24,545 topics). This International Cybercrime is worse (more manipulative) than 59.20% of the peer group.
International Cybercrime

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

59% percentile
025507510059.2% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.6%6.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.0%3.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.9%3.9%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.5%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos