Topic summary
⁠32%2 analyzed articles/videos814 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Inter Tribal Relations results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 264 hits. Analysis detected 1,796 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,256 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (14,529 of 22,650 topics). This Inter Tribal Relations is better (less manipulative) than 64.10% of the peer group.
Inter Tribal Relations
Topic details
Total words: 3,256
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510035.9% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%No True Scotsman: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.1%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.4%Red Herring: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos